Crafter.Review/process/templates/config.json

129 lines
2.4 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

{
"base": "origin/main",
"rangeFrom": "upstream",
"authors": [
"you@example.com"
],
"aiTrailers": "forbid",
"requireSigned": false,
"allowDirty": [],
"gate0": [
"make check"
],
"lenses": {
"repo-better-solution": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
},
"repo-functional": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "browser",
"section": null
},
"repo-bug-prover": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
},
"repo-security": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
},
"repo-facts": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"better-solution": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"code-quality": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"minimalism": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"bug-prover": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"facts": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"consistency": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"process-docs": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"etiquette": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"conciseness": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated. The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem, defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux, and excuses no unit from the holes. The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt, job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00
},
"maintainer-persona": {
"run": false,
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text. The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one. The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry (2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys, in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens) and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 01:30:22 +01:00
"environment": "none",
"section": null
}
},
"supabase": {
"dbUrl": "postgresql://postgres:postgres@127.0.0.1:54322/postgres",
"start": null,
"stop": null,
"notes": ""
},
"slots": {
"dir": null,
"start": null,
"stop": null,
"memMb": null,
"startMb": null
},
"functional": {
"appUrl": "http://localhost:8080",
"readyPath": "/",
"apiUrls": [],
"start": "make run",
"stop": "make stop",
"login": {
"fixtures": [
".local-stack/test-user.json"
],
"notes": "the fixture holds a TOTP-verified login"
},
"exclude": [
"**/*.test.*",
"**/*.spec.*",
"docs/**",
".github/**",
"*.md"
],
"extraTools": [],
"mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": null
},
"notes": ""
}
}