Commit graph Crafter.Review/tests/KernelModes/main.cpp
Author SHA1 Message Date
6cf15919db
feat(config): lens sections - a repository's own text appended to a shipped charter
A lens has one charter, the one this pipeline ships; what a repository
knows that is not general to the lens - its platform and layers, the
record it keeps its decisions in, what its users already have, the
calibration entries that are its own - goes in a file the config names
for the lens (lenses.<name>.section), and Charter appends it after one
blank line. The charter sha in every reuse key covers the combined text.

The config refuses a path outside the repository - absolute, or
climbing out with `..` - by the check slots.dir had, now one both
settings share; a file missing or one the run could not use (a dangling
link, unreadable, not UTF-8) is a problem too, checked through the
reader Charter uses (Prompt::ReadSection), so a section is never
dropped in silence, and a name that is no lens is the unknown key it
always was. Nothing lists a directory, so what lies beside the files is
no concern of the config's: a directory listed would have to tolerate or
refuse every foreign entry. The run logs which charters got one.

The better-solution charter gains a consumer's general entry
(2026-10-31: a mechanism reworked a second time in one submission is the
signal to derive the fix at every layer the data crosses). The procedure
names the section wherever it names the charter: among the config's keys,
in the lens inputs, in the reuse rule (an edit to either re-runs the lens)
and in the feedback loop, which routes a repository's own lesson to its
section and a general one to the shipped charter.
2026-11-01 23:56:26 +01:00
339f4b9b40
feat(modes): the kernel modes - a patch series and a mailing-list reply
Beside the push gates, crafter-review runs the pre-send review of a kernel
contributor's workbench: --mode series over a format-patch export with its
cover letter, --mode reply over a mail draft. The inventory partitions a
cover letter, a plain mail and the camera review's shape; ten kernel lenses
join the table with their gates (structure, code, artifact truth) and the
persona gate - one maintainer-persona instance per --reviewers entry, its
whole pass gating its blocks and pruning the units that are not theirs. A
series' code units are keyed on the code like the push gates'; every text
unit on its text, the references it cites and the anchor when it is dated.
The references an artifact cites are prefetched through utilities/lore.py
into the gate-state, with a digest in the run layer, and a persona's
calibration map is its lore listing. The kernel schema carries the persona
vocabulary, the kernel note kinds, the predicted review and the not-mine
list; the matrix the persona holes, the thin and the modelled units; gates
clean without a persona pass is GATES CLEAN. A reply's gate-state sits
beside the draft and is read once; a kernel mode needs --subsystem,
defaults the effort to max and the trees to work/linux,work/milos-linux,
and excuses no unit from the holes.

The kernel lenses and the common text ship verbatim; the table lists them
after the push gates' lenses and the config template holds them off, so a
repository that never turns them on changes nothing. Prompts, keys and plans
were checked byte for byte against the pipeline these modes replace, on its
own artifacts: two replies and a series, every system prompt, user prompt,
job and reuse key identical.
2026-10-31 22:56:12 +01:00