PoisonFid takes the payload and offsets to the fid field internally. It was
being handed a span already offset by the payload offset, so the poison landed
at payload+0x20 and the real fid field stayed zero. A frame where the matcher
never ran then looks exactly like a frame where it ran and rejected -- which is
the specific failure this project has recorded three times and is precisely
what the poison exists to prevent.
Visible in a real run: the frames marked REJECTED were 138, 138, 133, 137, 134
against a floor of 136, i.e. every one of them was a finger-RELEASE frame with
nothing on the sensor. Five rejections that never happened.
The two offsets are numerically equal, which is why double-applying is silent,
so the test now pins both directions: poisoning the payload marks the fid
field, and poisoning an already-offset span leaves it zero and misclassifies.
Also adds --rescan=N, which patches common.max_authentication_rescan_times into
the config. The stock budget lets a whole run end with no terminal verdict --
correct for shipping, useless as a measurement, because a wrong-finger control
that never reaches a verdict has not demonstrated a rejection. Forcing 0 makes
every frame terminal. It prints MEASUREMENT ONLY because a rate taken that way
is a per-frame figure with the retry mechanism disabled, and is not a shipping
reject rate.
Jorijn van der Graaf
afb7496ef6