Linux fingerprint sensor daemon for QTEE devices
  • C++ 88.6%
  • Shell 11.4%
Find a file
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Jorijn van der Graaf 1fb57cd1be Own the sensor rail, and run the init chain against it
The daemon now powers the sensor and initialises the trustlet against it. On
the phone, every step of the chain returning rc=0:

    gpiochip 'f100000.pinctrl' is /dev/gpiochip5 (168 lines)
    sensor powered, reset released, irq=1
      CMD 0x1006 INIT_SPI          rc=0
      CMD 0x100a PROBE_DEVICE      rc=0
      CMD 0x100b INIT_DEVICE       rc=0
      CMD 0x1004 TA_INIT           rc=0
      CMD 0x1020 WORK_MODE         rc=0
      CMD 0x100e SYNC_STATISTICS   rc=0

GPIO v2 chardev ioctls directly rather than libgpiod, which is on neither the
phone nor the sysroot and would be a dependency for three lines.

The chip is found by label, and the label is not what the device tree calls it:
the node is pinctrl@f100000 so the chardev advertises "f100000.pinctrl", while
every DT reference says "tlmm". Matching on "tlmm" finds nothing, which is how
the first run failed. There is a second check on the line count, because this
SoC has another pinctrl with 23 lines and driving line 75 of the wrong
controller is not something you recover from over ssh.

The XPU guard is enforced where the line is actually opened, not only asserted
in the core. gpio8-11 are the fingerprint SPI pads and touching one is an
immediate SError with the phone rebooting where it stands, so a refusal has to
sit in front of the ioctl.

Owning the rail is what makes the session recoverable at all: one reset buys
exactly one trustlet init and a second answers -205, so a failed session needs
the rail cycled rather than the chain retried. The harness split these across
two processes and every run began by restarting the one holding the rail.

CAPTURE_IMAGE answers -201 here and that is correct, not a regression: it needs
a shared memory region whose address QTEE patches into the payload, and none is
supplied yet. That is the next piece.
2026-09-02 18:24:12 +02:00
implementations Own the sensor rail, and run the init chain against it 2026-09-02 18:24:12 +02:00
interfaces Own the sensor rail, and run the init chain against it 2026-09-02 18:24:12 +02:00
packaging Reach QTEE: credentials, client env and the app loader, with no QCBOR 2026-09-02 18:02:28 +02:00
tests Own the sensor rail, and run the init chain against it 2026-09-02 18:24:12 +02:00
.gitignore Initial commit: the gpfile wire format, pinned by two real containers 2026-09-02 16:02:46 +02:00
LICENSE Initial commit: the gpfile wire format, pinned by two real containers 2026-09-02 16:02:46 +02:00
lint-rules.h Initial commit: the gpfile wire format, pinned by two real containers 2026-09-02 16:02:46 +02:00
project.cpp Own the sensor rail, and run the init chain against it 2026-09-02 18:24:12 +02:00
README.md Add the cross-build sysroot recipe, verified on the device 2026-09-02 17:34:27 +02:00

fingerprintd

Fingerprint daemon for the Fairphone 6 (milos, SM7635) on mainline Linux.

Why a daemon

The sensor is a FocalTech FT9391 on a TrustZone-owned SPI bus. spi@a88000 is disabled in both the mainline and the stock Android device tree, and the pads are XPU-protected — touching them from the normal world is an instant SError reboot. Every pixel the sensor produces stays inside the TEE: capture, preprocessing, the classifier, enrolment and matching all run in the focal64 trustlet, which reports a matched finger id and nothing else. A libfprint-style driver cannot exist on this device.

So the normal world's job is narrower than usual, and none of it is per-request work:

  • Power the sensor. Rail on gpio29, reset on gpio74, interrupt on gpio75 — the same division of labour the downstream driver uses. One sensor reset buys exactly one trustlet init, so whatever powers the sensor must also hold the session open.
  • Be QTEE's filesystem. QTEE cannot reach storage. When the trustlet saves or loads a template it calls back into the normal world through the gpfile (0x7000) and RPMB (0x2000) listeners, and expects them served. QTEE does the crypto and the anti-rollback; this side moves opaque bytes and performs the authenticated RPMB transactions against the UFS device.
  • Speak a biometrics API. The daemon owns net.reactivated.Fprint, so pam_fprintd, the Plasma fingerprint KCM and fprintd-enroll(1) work against it unmodified.

A listener registration is held for as long as the process lives and QTEE's listener table is global to the boot, so this has to be one long-lived process rather than a tool spawned per request.

Layout

interfaces/     Fingerprintd{,-Sfs}.cppm   the core: pure C++ modules
implementations/main.cpp                   the daemon shell
tests/                                     one suite per core module

fingerprintd-core is a static library with no GLib, no libqcomtee and no system headers. Everything in it is a wire format or a state machine that was recovered by reverse-engineering, so all of it is pinned by tests that run on a dev box with no phone, no TEE and no sensor. The daemon shell holds everything that touches hardware.

Build

crafter-build              # bin/fingerprintd-<target>-<march>/fingerprintd
crafter-build test         # the unit suites

Cross-compiling for the phone:

packaging/make-sysroot.sh                        # once; no root, no qemu, no device
crafter-build -- --target=aarch64-alpine-linux-musl \
  --sysroot=~/.cache/fingerprintd/sysroot-aarch64-alpine \
  --march=armv8-a --mtune=generic
crafter-build test --target=aarch64-alpine-linux-musl --sysroot=... \
  --march=armv8-a --mtune=generic                # runs the suites under qemu-aarch64

The result links dynamically against the phone's own musl and libc++ (libc++, libc++abi, libunwind, libgcc_s, all already present on pmOS). The research harness this replaces had to be built -static, but only because it was built with the host's glibc toolchain — that constraint does not apply to a real Alpine sysroot.

Verified on the device: all five suites pass cross-built and run on the phone itself, not only under emulation.

Status

The core is complete; the daemon does not run yet. Everything was ported out of the research harness that first made the sensor work (utilities/fpta.c in the fp6 repo), one module at a time, each landing with its tests before the next started.

module what it holds
:Sfs the gpfile frame — the read/write offset split, the O_TRUNC guard, root mapping, path-traversal rejection
:Rpmb request/reply framing, the bytes-transferred out-parameter, JEDEC result codes, chunking, the one-time-programmable key guard
:Ta command surface, the 740-byte event context, capture flags, SAVE_DATA masks, enrol/auth payloads, the error table, the verdict rule
:Engine baseline calibration, touch edges, enrolment progress, and the accounting
:Store the finger name map

Every constant that was recovered by reverse-engineering carries where it came from, and the tests are written to fail if it is undone rather than to restate it. Several replay real captures: two SFS containers off the phone, and three recorded authentication runs.

Next is the I/O shell — the TEE session, the sensor rail, the RPMB device and the bus — which is the first part that cannot be validated without hardware.

The working reference enrols a finger, keeps it across a reboot, and matches it with zero false accepts; the port exists to turn that into a service rather than to rediscover it.

Runtime dependencies, not carried here

The focal64 trustlet is proprietary and is not in this repo. It is extracted from the device's own stock Android partition on first boot by the fp6-vendor-blobs mechanism, the same way the audio firmware is.