| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
FF_CMD_TA_REMOVE, recovered the way AUTHENTICATE was: read the stub, read the handler. The 0x2006 stub at 0xa15c is a bare `ldp w0, w1, [payload]`, so the request is two u32s -- gid at +0, fid at +4 -- and the 0x2000 dispatcher validates no length. Walking the jump table reproduces authenticate at 0xa180, which is the address already on record, so the table read is sound. Three preconditions, all the trustlet's own. The gid must be the ACTIVE group (it compares against device+0x30, the field SET_ACTIVE_GROUP writes). The fid must be non-zero: zero is not "remove all", it is an error the trustlet logs and refuses. And the fid must be among the loaded templates, because it removes by the SLOT INDEX it finds, not by id. It persists: on a hit the trustlet formats ff_template_<gid>_<slot>.bin and calls ff_file_delete, which arrives on our gpfile listener as an unlink -- so this only works with the store served writable. Proven harmlessly first. --probe-remove sends one command with no map involvement, and a fid the group does not hold answers rc=-2 with the real template untouched -- which is what established that both words are read where we send them, before anything was deleted. Then for real, through fprintd-delete: both 347202-byte containers and their .bak companions unlinked, templates loaded 1 -> 0, and a re-enrolment afterwards completed 20 stages with SAVE_DATA rc=0, so the store is consistent after a removal rather than merely emptier. The ordering the transcript shows is worth keeping: the group index is rewritten and the RPMB anti-rollback counter bumped BEFORE each unlink. That is precisely why an orderly removal leaves a valid store where restoring an older container leaves a tampered one -- the counter has already moved past it. The delete reply now waits for the worker, because only that thread invokes the trustlet and fprintd's Delete methods are synchronous. Names are dropped before templates on purpose: a template that survives a failed removal is a slot leak, while a name that survives a successful one keeps offering a finger that can no longer match. |
||
| .. | ||
| 20-focal64.manifest | ||
| 80-fingerprintd.preset | ||
| APKBUILD | ||
| build-package.sh | ||
| deploy-dev.sh | ||
| fingerprintd.json | ||
| fingerprintd.modules-load.conf | ||
| fingerprintd.service | ||
| fingerprintd.tmpfiles.conf | ||
| fpenrol.sh | ||
| fplearn.sh | ||
| fptrial.sh | ||
| make-bin-tarball.sh | ||
| make-libqcomtee.sh | ||
| make-sysroot.sh | ||
| mnt-persist.mount | ||
| net.reactivated.Fprint.conf | ||
| net.reactivated.fprint.device.policy | ||
| net.reactivated.Fprint.service | ||
| README.config.md | ||
fingerprintd.json — where it comes from, and why this exact file
The trustlet gates its config file on common.configuration_uuid and silently
falls back to built-in defaults on a mismatch, so the file is not decorative:
SYNC_CONFIG returning 0 is what makes the whole init chain run.
This copy is generated, not hand-written. Its source is fp6fpcfg.py in the
fp6 bring-up repo, which builds it from the captured stock configuration dump
(journal/fingerprint/captures/2026-08-25-focal64-effective-config-from-stock.txt):
utilities/fp6fpcfg.py --daemon --verbose > packaging/fingerprintd.json
sha256 begins b205c756914a66f1.
Why the --verbose variant
--verbose here is the trustlet's own log level, not the daemon's. It is
shipped because it is the file every accuracy number was measured on — 30/30
held presses, zero false accepts, 36-330 ms to a verdict — and the TA's log
level cannot be raised again by a runtime SYNC_CONFIG, so a session that
needs the matcher's own lines has to have started with it.
--daemon alone produces the same file with trustlet logging off (sha256
6c4503e628406424, four diagnosis.* keys differ and nothing else). It is
plausibly the better shipping default and it is untested: no rate in the
journal was measured on it. Switching is a measurement, not an edit.
The two policy keys
common.max_authentication_rescan_times: 0— at the stock budget a wrong finger never yields a terminal frame, so a PAM client waits forever for theverify-no-matchit needs.trustlet.enable_trusted_enrollment: false— skips the challenge compare and thehw_auth_tokenHMAC verify. pmOS has no Gatekeeper to issue a token and nothing on pmOS verifies one.