fingerprintd/packaging
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Jorijn van der Graaf 93d7f96a63 Drop two fields nobody needed: session was a no-op, and no-unlock is the finger
Jorijn caught both.

`session` declared nothing. The FingerMatched signal is emitted for every
matched finger unconditionally -- it never consulted the config -- so a
`session` line was a rule the format invited you to write that did exactly
nothing. Announcing every finger is the right default anyway: a session agent
should not need a root-owned file to declare its interest in a signal it is
free to ignore. The column is gone.

Which leaves the config for the two things that really do need the daemon, and
with `session` gone the verdict column had no partner left to vary against. It
read as a property of the finger while being a property of the attempt, so it
is now written as what it is:

    <finger>  [no-unlock]  [absolute command...]

no-unlock says the finger never unlocks; a command is what root runs. At least
one is required, because a finger listed alone says nothing the signal does not
already say -- and that is a parse error rather than a silently useless line.

The example config now also states plainly what no-unlock is not. It is a panic
button, not deniability: the rejection it fabricates comes back in milliseconds
where a real one takes about three seconds, the journal records that the finger
actually matched, the file names the finger in plain text, and the finger still
shows as enrolled. Both of those weaknesses are real and neither is fixed here.
2026-09-05 05:23:40 +02:00
..
20-focal64.manifest A verify nobody answered is not a failure, and the trustlet is not ours to ship 2026-09-05 04:01:06 +02:00
80-fingerprintd.preset Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
actions.conf.example Drop two fields nobody needed: session was a no-op, and no-unlock is the finger 2026-09-05 05:23:40 +02:00
APKBUILD Drop two fields nobody needed: session was a no-op, and no-unlock is the finger 2026-09-05 05:23:40 +02:00
build-package.sh Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
deploy-dev.sh Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
fingerprint-auth.pam Give a finger a meaning beyond "it was you" 2026-09-05 05:12:41 +02:00
fingerprintd.json Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
fingerprintd.modules-load.conf Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
fingerprintd.service A verify nobody answered is not a failure, and the trustlet is not ours to ship 2026-09-05 04:01:06 +02:00
fingerprintd.tmpfiles.conf Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
fpenrol.sh fpenrol.sh: no enrolment ever received the position guidance this script claims 2026-09-03 17:44:35 +02:00
fplearn.sh fplearn.sh: a wipe leaves learning off too 2026-09-05 02:07:26 +02:00
fptrial.sh Hold, do not tap -- and stop spending the verdict on a frame that cannot carry it 2026-09-05 00:17:13 +02:00
make-bin-tarball.sh Give a finger a meaning beyond "it was you" 2026-09-05 05:12:41 +02:00
make-libqcomtee.sh Reach QTEE: credentials, client env and the app loader, with no QCBOR 2026-09-02 18:02:28 +02:00
make-sysroot.sh Add the cross-build sysroot recipe, verified on the device 2026-09-02 17:34:27 +02:00
mnt-persist.mount Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
net.reactivated.Fprint.conf Give a finger a meaning beyond "it was you" 2026-09-05 05:12:41 +02:00
net.reactivated.fprint.device.policy Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
net.reactivated.Fprint.service Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00
README.config.md Package the daemon, so a fingerprint survives a reflash 2026-09-05 02:52:01 +02:00

fingerprintd.json — where it comes from, and why this exact file

The trustlet gates its config file on common.configuration_uuid and silently falls back to built-in defaults on a mismatch, so the file is not decorative: SYNC_CONFIG returning 0 is what makes the whole init chain run.

This copy is generated, not hand-written. Its source is fp6fpcfg.py in the fp6 bring-up repo, which builds it from the captured stock configuration dump (journal/fingerprint/captures/2026-08-25-focal64-effective-config-from-stock.txt):

utilities/fp6fpcfg.py --daemon --verbose > packaging/fingerprintd.json

sha256 begins b205c756914a66f1.

Why the --verbose variant

--verbose here is the trustlet's own log level, not the daemon's. It is shipped because it is the file every accuracy number was measured on — 30/30 held presses, zero false accepts, 36-330 ms to a verdict — and the TA's log level cannot be raised again by a runtime SYNC_CONFIG, so a session that needs the matcher's own lines has to have started with it.

--daemon alone produces the same file with trustlet logging off (sha256 6c4503e628406424, four diagnosis.* keys differ and nothing else). It is plausibly the better shipping default and it is untested: no rate in the journal was measured on it. Switching is a measurement, not an edit.

The two policy keys

  • common.max_authentication_rescan_times: 0 — at the stock budget a wrong finger never yields a terminal frame, so a PAM client waits forever for the verify-no-match it needs.
  • trustlet.enable_trusted_enrollment: false — skips the challenge compare and the hw_auth_token HMAC verify. pmOS has no Gatekeeper to issue a token and nothing on pmOS verifies one.