From e545936e06f1c7173ab41a5f33a77ff43ced3a8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Daly Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 18:23:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] iio: light: veml6075: add bounds check to veml6075_it_ms index commit 307dc4240bd41852d9e0912921e298160db1c109 upstream. veml6075_it_ms has 5 elements but VEML6075_CONF_IT can yield values 0-7. If it returns a value >= 5, this causes an out-of-bounds array access. Add a bounds check and return -EINVAL if the index is out of range. The problem values are reserved so should never be read from the register. Hence this is hardening against fault device, missprogramming or bus corruption. Assisted-by: gkh_clanker_2000 Cc: stable Signed-off-by: Sam Daly Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Javier Carrasco Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/iio/light/veml6075.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/veml6075.c b/drivers/iio/light/veml6075.c index edbb43407054..f7eb159e5cb4 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/veml6075.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/veml6075.c @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec veml6075_channels[] = { static int veml6075_request_measurement(struct veml6075_data *data) { - int ret, conf, int_time; + int ret, conf, int_time, int_index; ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, VEML6075_CMD_CONF, &conf); if (ret < 0) @@ -117,7 +117,11 @@ static int veml6075_request_measurement(struct veml6075_data *data) * time for all possible configurations. Using a 1.50 factor simplifies * operations and ensures reliability under all circumstances. */ - int_time = veml6075_it_ms[FIELD_GET(VEML6075_CONF_IT, conf)]; + int_index = FIELD_GET(VEML6075_CONF_IT, conf); + if (int_index >= ARRAY_SIZE(veml6075_it_ms)) + return -EINVAL; + + int_time = veml6075_it_ms[int_index]; msleep(int_time + (int_time / 2)); /* shutdown again, data registers are still accessible */